360 Feedback employee perspective
So your company is conducting 360 Degree Reviews with Small Improvements? Here's a brief overview of the process. You'll receive an invite, nominate your reviewers, and potentially be nominated to provide feedback for others.
Article Quick Links
- Process Overview
- Part 1: Invitation to get started
- Part 2: Nominate your reviewers
- Part 3: Invitation to provide feedback to others
- Part 4: Providing your feedback
- Part 5: Receiving your feedback
This video goes through the general flow of a 360 Feedback round - starting with you nominating reviewers - this, however, may not be how HR set up the cycle. See below the Process Overview
360 Degree Feedback (or "peer feedback") means that employees can receive feedback from coworkers and from managers, and managers can get feedback from their direct reports, too. As a result, feedback is more democratic than if just the manager had provided it.
The default process looks like this:
- HR defines who gets reviewed, and lets you know.
- You nominate reviewers.
- Your manager approves (or modifies) your reviewer selection.
- Your reviewers write their feedback about you (and you write feedback about them).
- Feedback gets delivered! Either to you, to your manager, or to both of you.
The workflow can be configured by your HR team, so details will vary from company to company. Depending on the settings, Small Improvements always keeps you in the loop by sending you emails to let you know what to do and when to do it.
Part 1: Invitation to get started
After one of your HR Admins has set up a 360 process, an email will let you know that the 360 degree cycle is beginning and that it's time to nominate your reviewers. The mail looks something like this:
Click the link in the mail, and it will take you to a form that lets you nominate your reviewers.
If you simply log in and access the homepage, the task overview will also tell you to nominate reviewers:
Part 2: Nominate your reviewers
Most important is the "Who should give you feedback?" form. This is where you nominate reviewers. You accomplish this by simply typing their names into the field provided. A list of reviewers will build up and once you're done just click on the "Complete Nominations" button.
- Your manager will get notified in time to approve your list. They can approve it as is or modify it. You can also still modify the list, but only up until your manager approves it.
- Once approved by your manager, the selected reviewers will get notified by automatic email to provide feedback about (or for) you.
The whole nominations process looks like this:
Part 3: Invitation to provide feedback to others
While you were nominating your reviewers, other people may have nominated you as their reviewer. Once approved by their managers, you will get an invitation email explaining who you should provide feedback to.
Here's an example of what a mail you may receive might look like:
You can also always use the Small Improvements homepage to see your upcoming tasks, like providing feedback to others:
In this sample you see the to do list. You can click the "Provide Feedback" button for each person. Or if you don't wish to provide feedback, click the downward facing arrow to reveal a "decline" option.
Also, if you have already been working on feedback and saving as you go, you have a "Done" shortcut within the drop down as well, allowing you to release the feedback to the reviewee (depending on the feedback release schedule your HR Admin has defined).
Part 4: Providing your feedback
After you've clicked the link in the mail (or on the homepage), you will be taken straight into the 360 degree feedback screen.
Below is an example of the questionnaire you'll see:
For instance, the process to provide feedback about Sarah could look like the following animated gif. You can write feedback in response to questions defined by the HR Admin who kicked off the 360 process, and you can see additional information, like who will be able to see the feedback and when your feedback will become available to the recipient.
Important aspects of this screen:
- Save: There are two major buttons near the end of the demo above. The "Save" button will become active once you've written some text, but only the "Done" button actually ensures your feedback gets delivered the recipient when the time is up.
- Done: If your HR Admin has defined a "release date" for the feedback, then clicking "Done" will not make your feedback available instantly; it will only be delivered on that date. If your HR Admin has elected to have the feedback released immediately, or if there was a defined released date and it has already passed, your feedback will be instantly visible to the recipient.
- Using the resources tab: Depending on your working relationship with who you will be giving feedback to, you can take advantage of past feedback and objectives. Visibility into these is all defined on what was shared with you, which is often defined by reporting structure.
- Next steps: After indicating you are done and ready to share (from the feedback form), you are taken back to the homepage with your to do list. You'll see that the "open" to do items are always at the top, so you can easily start or continue working on them.
Part 5: Receiving your feedback
Receiving feedback depends on how your HR team set up the feedback cycle. If they defined that feedback only goes to your manager, your manager will incorporate the feedback for you into your next performance review. But if HR set up the 360 degree cycle so that feedback goes out to the recipients too, you will receive a mail on the release date.
Feedback from the Your 360 Feedback page:
Depending on how your HR team set up the process, the feedback may be anonymous or not. If it's anonymous, the feedback gets presented to you in randomized order. The first response to the first question is not necessarily by the same person who wrote the first response to the second question!
In case HR made the feedback very anonymous, the feedback by each reviewer may get get split up per paragraph, and the paragraphs get shuffled around, so it's impossible to know who wrote what. This protects the anonymity of the reviewers, and thereby leads to more honest feedback.